HomeThe 100 sourcesOur analysisMethodology Published by Stock Market Picks. Version 1.0 (scoring) · 1.0 (analysis rules). Every number on this site can be reproduced from the stored recommendations, prices and these rules. The Stock Consensus 100 is a fixed list of 100 sources plus Stock Market Picks's own featured pickers. "Best" means highest-ranked under this methodology within the eligible panel; it does not claim to have evaluated every stock picker in existence. Membership is reviewed quarterly, prior lists and effective dates are preserved, and retired members stay in the historical record. Each member has a role. Originators, newsletters, fund managers, short sellers and featured pickers cast votes. Aggregators (news sites, data portals, brokerages that redistribute research) and communities are reporting channels: a call they relay is credited to the originator once. The same analyst call reported by Yahoo Finance, CNBC and MarketBeat is one vote, not four. A repeat of an identical active call within 7 days is logged as a duplicate and does not create a new vote. Every source is scored on five published criteria, 0–20 each. These describe the quality of the evidence a source produces, not its stock-picking skill. Computed only from completed calls with price history, at the 63-session horizon, one observation per recommendation episode (reiterations do not count twice). Components are converted to percentiles within the panel, then combined: 50% benchmark-relative return, 30% directional success rate, 20% consistency across calendar quarters. The result is shrunk toward 50 for small samples (weight n/(n+10)). Members with fewer than 30 completed episodes are labeled "small sample"; fully ranked status needs 24 months of history, 30 episodes and 10 stocks. Bullish calls are measured as stock return minus benchmark (SPY); bearish calls as benchmark minus stock (a recommendation measure, not a simulated short). Neutral calls are judged inside a ±10% band and excluded from bullish/bearish hit rates. Price-target accuracy (reached before deadline, and distance at deadline) is tracked separately so sources that do not publish targets are not penalized. Outcomes are evaluated at 21, 63, 126 and 252 sessions. Bullish = 100, Neutral = 50, Bearish = 0. Score = Σ(value × weight) ÷ Σ(weight) over active votes. Weight = performance multiplier (0.5–1.5, from the Picker Performance Score) × freshness (half-life 90 days). One vote per picker per stock. Calls expire at their stated horizon or after 180 days when no horizon is given (labeled "assumed"). The default horizon is 365 days. Missing coverage never counts as neutral or bearish. Price targets never move the score; the panel price target is the median of targets with comparable horizons. Coverage labels: fewer than 5 independent research groups = insufficient; 5–9 = limited; 10+ = standard. A score of 80 means the weighted panel leans strongly bullish. It is not a probability of profit. Each daily snapshot stores an explanation. Contributions are attributed in a fixed order: (1) new, upgraded, downgraded, reiterated and expired votes; (2) residual drift from freshness decay and performance-weight updates. Contributions reconcile to the displayed change. The commentary on every stock page is generated by these rules, in order, and each sentence shows the rule that produced it. After each U.S. session the engine refreshes prices, expires stale calls, evaluates newly completed outcomes, recalculates picker scores, snapshots every stock, and writes the change explanation. Failed feeds produce a visible delayed/partial status on the homepage; they never silently remove opinions. Scores describe panel opinion and measured history. They are not investment advice, not a forecast by Stock Market Picks, and not a guarantee of any outcome. Every recommendation shown is attributable to a dated source.Methodology
1. The panel
2. Source Quality rubric (0–100)
Attribution Calls are dated and tied to a named analyst, author, model or committee. Originality The source originates its own calls rather than relaying others'. Transparency Publishes a track record, methodology, or audited performance. Free access How much of the actual recommendation can be read without paying. Breadth Breadth of U.S. single-stock coverage. 3. Picker Performance Score (0–100)
4. Stock Consensus Score (0–100)
5. Why the score changed
6. Stock Market Picks analysis rules
A1Coverage gate: with fewer than 5 independent research groups the stance is "insufficient evidence" and no directional view is stated. A2Stance: score ≥ 70 = panel leans bullish; ≤ 40 = panel leans bearish; otherwise mixed. A3Conviction: a weighted score more than 8 points above the equal-weight score means better-ranked pickers are more bullish than the crowd (and vice versa). A4Trend: a 21-session score change of ±5 or more is called improving/weakening; ±10 or more is called sharply. A5Disagreement: vote dispersion (standard deviation of 0/50/100 votes) above 35 is flagged as a contested name. A6Target gap: implied move to the median comparable target of more than ±20% is highlighted; targets never change the score. A7Short-seller flag: any active bearish call from a short-research member is named, because those calls are investigative rather than valuation-based. A8House view: active calls by Stock Market Picks featured pickers are stated with their method, and whether they agree with the panel. A9Freshness: if the newest active call is older than 45 days the view is labeled stale. 7. Daily update
8. What this is not
